Amazon Web Services vs Bluehost

Same fields, both providers, side by side — so the comparison is the table, not our opinion.

Amazon Web Services
4.7
$3.50/mo
VS
Bluehost
4.5
$2.95/mo
Head to head

Every field, matched up

Amazon Web ServicesBluehost
Rating 4.7/5 4.5/5
Reviews 31,240 21,870
Entry price $3.50/mo $2.95/mo
Uptime 99.99% 99.98%
Founded 2006 1996
Country United States United States
Hosting types Cloud, VPS, Dedicated Shared, WordPress, VPS
Money-back guarantee None stated 30 days
Support channels Documentation & forums (free), AWS Developer Support ($29/mo), Business Support ($100/mo), Enterprise Support (custom) 24/7 live chat, 24/7 phone support, Email ticketing, Help center
Data center locations 7 1
Trade-offs

Where each one wins

Amazon Web Services — in its favour

  • Unmatched breadth of services
  • Global availability and reliability
  • Industry-standard enterprise platform

Bluehost — in its favour

  • Official WordPress partner
  • Generous free-tier extras
  • Solid uptime record
Reading the table

Which one to pick

On price, Bluehost starts lower at $2.95/mo against $3.50/mo for Amazon Web Services. Amazon Web Services carries the higher rating overall, at 4.7/5, and Amazon Web Services reports the better tracked uptime at 99.99%. Bluehost has been operating longer, since 1996.

If entry price is what decides it, start with Bluehost. If rating and reliability matter more than the sticker price, Amazon Web Services has the edge. Either way, read the full profile before you buy — the trade-offs section on each page covers what the summary numbers leave out.

Keep comparing

Other hosts worth a look

vs

Amazon Web Services vs Kinsta
vs

Amazon Web Services vs BigScoots
vs

Amazon Web Services vs Rocket.net
vs

Amazon Web Services vs Hostinger